Virtuality Potentiality Actuality and All Quadrants All Lines discusses different realities in natural language. V P A discusses how content emergence to form and is created in this juncture of history each new emergence would require a new theory. AQAL does only discuss the form but not the content of natural language. V P A is a method of the dialectics between analog and digital realities, AQAL is form that is analog attended through extensive meditative practice, yet is a theory of mapping methods and their byproducts the perspectives and holons that they create. So one is used as a method for interactive language that is in-between the individual habitual content and collective law form and the other is for mapping of perspectives and their holons and to see how it all fits together. So V P A is a new method it's emphasis are sociont-in-action , AQAL is a mapping of methods it's emphasis are sociont-in-action. Then we could say that AQAL is more on the side of the sociont itself and it's many pronouns wheras V P A discuss the action with it's difference of verbs. All that is real yet we do not differentiate is the virtual, the virtual is thus the infinite, all that we differentiate out of all that is real is the actual, the actual is thus the one, in-between the indeterminate and the determinate, we have the transdeterminate which is the potential, because it is actions that have relational potency, it is the many. From this we learn that the virtual happens prior to the potentiality which happens prior to the actual. Yet in AQAL the quadrants are singular as the upper quadrants and plural as the lower quadrants. What’s more we have lines and these lines are in themselves infinite because we haven’t differentiated the talents. In some fundamental sense then we begin undifferentiated with talents, that then emerges as habits that then emerge as local laws. V P A and AQAL is thus similar and different. What is clear is that it’s the lower quadrants that is preferable then the upper quadrants by V P A.